| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
project71beats Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:37 pm Post subject: 64 bit vs 32 bit |
|
|
I have windows 7 64bit and Cubase 5.5.2 64 bit installed. Honestly I dont see any difference between 64 and 32 bit. On Windows or Cubase. In fact I find there to be more issues in 64 bit. Would it be worth while to go 32 bit just for the better compatibility? _________________ Cubase 5.5.2
Mbox 2
Steinberg Houston(died)
Korg TRITON Extreme
Akai MPD24
Yamaha HS80m
Windows 7 Premium 64 bit
Core 2 quad@ 2.3 -6gb Ram |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tonyg Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2005 Posts: 721 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Would it be worth while to go 32 bit just for the better compatibility? |
Sure, especially if you have favourite plug-ins that run at 32 bits only. _________________ P4, 3.0 Ghz Processor, Hyperthreading / 3.5GB Ram / XP Pro, SP3 / 160 GB HD / 19" LCD /
Seagate 350GB Ext Drive / E-MU 1212M / Studio 5 v5.5.2 / Notation / WaveLab / Midi Quest /
http://www.tonyg-pianokeys.com/
http://www.myspace.com/tonygpianokeys |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Betamac Member
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 Posts: 151 Location: East Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can't say I have noticed any performance difference between the two (based on the ASIO meter and crackles/drop outs)
But problems - I've had more problems in 64 bit, reaktor crashing/GUI freezing up, Halion One 'no presets'
Its hard for me to see the benefits at the moment personally
whats everyone's experience of the comparison between the two performance/problems wise _________________ Cubase 5.5 32 bit, Intel quad core running 64 bit Windows 7, 6gb ram, Izotope 4, T Racks 3, Loads of freeware plugins and Synths, edirol ua-25, Roland JV-1000, Spirit Absolute 2 Monitors. Samson Amp. Comfy Chair |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
project71beats Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even windows doesnt seem any faster/quicker/smoother. I came up from xp to a very short time with vista and quickly went to windows 7. I felt my xp 32 machine was best. I have a copy of windows 7 32 and obviously Cubase 5 32 and was thinking about starting from scratch. Asio drivers have been a big problem for me too.... _________________ Cubase 5.5.2
Mbox 2
Steinberg Houston(died)
Korg TRITON Extreme
Akai MPD24
Yamaha HS80m
Windows 7 Premium 64 bit
Core 2 quad@ 2.3 -6gb Ram |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ron Garrison Senior Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 1003
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:36 pm Post subject: Re: 64 bit vs 32 bit |
|
|
| project71beats wrote: | | I have windows 7 64bit and Cubase 5.5.2 64 bit installed. Honestly I dont see any difference between 64 and 32 bit. On Windows or Cubase. In fact I find there to be more issues in 64 bit. Would it be worth while to go 32 bit just for the better compatibility? |
The main reason to go to 64-bits is for the RAM. If you use VSTs with large memory footprints (i.e. lots of samples) then you may want to move to the 64-bit version.
That being said, you can use the 32-version and go a long way, as the 32-bit version (with VSTs) has access to 4GB (a little less). It doesn't have to share with the OS and other apps like it had to in a 32-bit OS.
If you do have a memory hungry VST then you can always JBridge it and give it its own memory space. You can even use 64-bit VSTs with 32-bit Cubase via JBridge.
Ron _________________ Quad Core 2.66 GHz (Q6700), Intel DP965LT MB, 8 GB Corsair XMS2 RAM (PC2 6400), 160 GB WD HD (System), 2 x 320GB Seagate HD (audio, samples), GeForce 7300LE, Silverstone ST50EF-Plus PS, Norco D810 RM Chassis, 24" LCD Monitor, Presonus Firepod, Windows 7 x64, C5-32, C5-64, Sonar 8.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
project71beats Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I remember more "freezing" in xp, now that I think about it. But in 64 bit I still don't bother using reverance, because its so slow to switch presets and Cubase would meltdown. All in all I have never understood why out of all the DAWs out there Cubase seems to be the worst when it comes to compatibilty and crashes. I have protools le and have not bothered to try it out, maybe I should because I am sick of all this crap. Then you get the guys who post "it works fine for me" I am a user who is always moving forward with technology and tries new things. I switch hardware a few times a year as its part of my business. I don't know, I might just do "the switch" considering when I bought my upgrade cubase was over $700here and the upgrade $250ish. now the whole dam program is $500. sheesh. And half of it never works.
Sorry for the rant, kinda off topic...the memories flooded back  _________________ Cubase 5.5.2
Mbox 2
Steinberg Houston(died)
Korg TRITON Extreme
Akai MPD24
Yamaha HS80m
Windows 7 Premium 64 bit
Core 2 quad@ 2.3 -6gb Ram |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DG Senior Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 1882
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| project71beats wrote: | I remember more "freezing" in xp, now that I think about it. But in 64 bit I still don't bother using reverance, because its so slow to switch presets and Cubase would meltdown. All in all I have never understood why out of all the DAWs out there Cubase seems to be the worst when it comes to compatibilty and crashes. I have protools le and have not bothered to try it out, maybe I should because I am sick of all this crap. Then you get the guys who post "it works fine for me" I am a user who is always moving forward with technology and tries new things. I switch hardware a few times a year as its part of my business. I don't know, I might just do "the switch" considering when I bought my upgrade cubase was over $700here and the upgrade $250ish. now the whole dam program is $500. sheesh. And half of it never works.
Sorry for the rant, kinda off topic...the memories flooded back  |
Pro Tools has no 64bit version, so it's not a fair comparison. If you work with Cubase 32bit (which has much better VSTi performance than Pro Tools anyway) you shouldn't have problems. I would do as one of the above posters said, and use 32bit Cubase with J-Bridge or VE Pro for memory hungry sample players.
DG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zebbie Member
Joined: 17 Mar 2007 Posts: 254 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've got used to 64-bit now, no problems since the JBridge 1.27 update sorted out BFD2. XP 32 bit was stable but RAM limitations were becoming a problem. I don't see anyone transitioning from 32 to 64 bit without some issues but I think most users are having a fairly painless experience. As usual it's the plug-ins that seem to cause the most problems.
And eventually, as the gorgeous Jeri Ryan might say, "You will be assimilated! Resistance is futile!"  _________________ Cubase 5.5.2 64 and 32 bit, Windows7 64 bit, Windows XP SP3 32 bit, AMD quad, 16 gb RAM, essential software support (JBridge!), Trilian, Omnisphere, Stylus RMX, Garritan Personal Orchestra, Kontact Komplete 7, Pod Farm, UX2, ESU1808, guitars, basses, amps. Steinberg/ Cubase user since Atari/Pro24, still 99.9% magic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugs Junior Member
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 15 Location: upstate ny
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
No Rewire in 64bit version. _________________ TL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robin Heuristic Senior Member
Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 1721 Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Install both and use the one which is most appropriate for your current project requirements. As pointed out before, if you don't use large RAM sucking plugins, then 32 should be fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Como Baila Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 104 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think I have anything to add ... except that there is an unopened Windows 7 64bit OEM package and 4 2GB sticks of RAM sitting in a box beside my PC waiting for me to find the courage to take the plunge.
I bought a "64 bit ready" Xeon server almost 4 years ago ... and recently realized that if I didn't get on the stick, I might not be able to find the PC2-5300 RAM any longer ... and then my upgrade strategy would be gutted.
I really got enthused when I started learning ... mostly over at Gearslutz ... that I could run my programs 32bit and keep all my plug-ins under the 64 bit OS, as long as I could find 64 bit drivers for all my hardware. Now that I've done my homework and happily discovered that everything I'm concerned about has 64 bit drivers ... I've got no excuses.
The increased RAM really excites me ... especially when I think that now I may really be able to utilize Rewire running my 32 bit apps. I've always wanted to rewire ACID for it's easy repitch and retempo features into C5, but sooner or later I always run out of memory and either crash or freeze. Same thing with Reason.
Well, I learned XP pretty well ... I guess I can learn Windows 7 before 128 bit OS comes along.
Como _________________ (AllWinXP Pro) Xeon 3ghz dual dual/4096/ WD Raptors Raid 0, P-IV 2.0/10242 & P-M4 1.2/1024 FireNet w Fx Teleport
RME Multiface PCI-e, Layla 24/96 & Delta 44
Mackie HR624 Monitors
Mackie CU, Novation Zero SL, Novation Nocturne, BCR2000, BRF2000, Trigger Finger, Remote25 & SL880 Pro Controllers
XP-Pro, Cubase SX 5, Acid Pro 6, Ableton Live 6 & Bundled 'Lite' Apps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
project71beats Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thats the thing, I took the plunge and noticed no real benefits. Thats my whole point. _________________ Cubase 5.5.2
Mbox 2
Steinberg Houston(died)
Korg TRITON Extreme
Akai MPD24
Yamaha HS80m
Windows 7 Premium 64 bit
Core 2 quad@ 2.3 -6gb Ram |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Como Baila Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 104 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hear you ... but maybe you didn't and still don't push your RAM? What Ron Garrison says is exactly what I've heard elsewhere ... and why I am going there. Well ... I am pulling my old hard drive and getting a new one for a fresh install so I can reboot to my XP if needed. I'm imagine running Rewire programs to Cubase ... but even if your not, you have to realize that unless you used the 3GB Switch in XP, under 64 each program can nearly access 4GB compared to barely 2GB under XP. That has got to improve thins if you run many VSTis or VSTs.
But really ... time is on 64bit's side. Imagine the difference between XP and Win98 or 3.1 for DAWs and audio tools. I wouldn't want to go back to Cool Edit Pro ... although it was great in the day. In time developers including Steiny are going to learn to take full advantage of 64bit ... and then you won't want to be without it.
Like I said, I also didn't want my really nice dual dualcore server to get stuck in 32bit land just because the memory it required is no longer available. I actually tried to buy 8 2GB DIMMs from New Egg and they would only sell me 4 ... that was all they had left of what I needed, the Corsair Fully Buffered ECC, and they didn't know if they were getting more. I then searched everywhere and couldn't find it at any of the ususual suspects ... CDW, ZipZoomFly, etc. So I think I made my move in the nick of time.
Como _________________ (AllWinXP Pro) Xeon 3ghz dual dual/4096/ WD Raptors Raid 0, P-IV 2.0/10242 & P-M4 1.2/1024 FireNet w Fx Teleport
RME Multiface PCI-e, Layla 24/96 & Delta 44
Mackie HR624 Monitors
Mackie CU, Novation Zero SL, Novation Nocturne, BCR2000, BRF2000, Trigger Finger, Remote25 & SL880 Pro Controllers
XP-Pro, Cubase SX 5, Acid Pro 6, Ableton Live 6 & Bundled 'Lite' Apps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
backbeat Junior Member
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 96 Location: Germany NRW
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Under Cubase 5 32Bit on 64Bit OS you can use up to 3,5GB Ram for the Cubase.exe in the Taskmanager.
After this Cubase just freezes.
In my projects I often use 32Bit Plugins.
The performance from Cubase 32Bit under 64Bit OS for me is better than CB 64Bit.
Try it! Make a Project under 32Bit with your favorite Plugins and save it, then open it in the 64Bit version and see how it performs. _________________ -------------------------------------------------------
http://soundcloud.com/user7273206
-------------------------------------------------------
Intel I3, 4GB RAM, Cubase 5.5, Reason 4, XP 32 SP3, Creamware Pulsar, KORE 2, KOMPLETE 5, Drehbank, MPD 24, Roland RS 5
2nd 64 Bit Sys: Intel q9600, 8GB Ram, Cubase 5.5 32Bit, Reason 4, Komplete 6, Vista 64,RME HDSP 9632,Mackie Control Universal PRO
3RD System: Cubase 5.5 , Intel Core 2 Quad q9550, 1TB HD,2GB RAM,XP 32 SP3,DAW Controller Radikal SAC 2.2 + Behringer BCR 2000, Motu 828Mk2, VSL 2020, 6Fire+Microwave PC
Yamaha NS10m, HS80 and Nubert AW440 Sub |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
centralmusic Grand Senior Member
Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Posts: 3720 Location: Hamburg, London, Paris, New York
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
64 bit vs. 32 bit?
I will wait for 128 bit. why not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
project71beats Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| backbeat wrote: | Under Cubase 5 32Bit on 64Bit OS you can use up to 3,5GB Ram for the Cubase.exe in the Taskmanager.
After this Cubase just freezes.
In my projects I often use 32Bit Plugins.
The performance from Cubase 32Bit under 64Bit OS for me is better than CB 64Bit.
Try it! Make a Project under 32Bit with your favorite Plugins and save it, then open it in the 64Bit version and see how it performs. |
good idea. but how do you install both versions? _________________ Cubase 5.5.2
Mbox 2
Steinberg Houston(died)
Korg TRITON Extreme
Akai MPD24
Yamaha HS80m
Windows 7 Premium 64 bit
Core 2 quad@ 2.3 -6gb Ram |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ron Garrison Senior Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 1003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| project71beats wrote: | | backbeat wrote: | Under Cubase 5 32Bit on 64Bit OS you can use up to 3,5GB Ram for the Cubase.exe in the Taskmanager.
After this Cubase just freezes.
In my projects I often use 32Bit Plugins.
The performance from Cubase 32Bit under 64Bit OS for me is better than CB 64Bit.
Try it! Make a Project under 32Bit with your favorite Plugins and save it, then open it in the 64Bit version and see how it performs. |
good idea. but how do you install both versions? |
Just install them both. You are given the choice when installing iirc. The 64-bit version installs under "Program Files" and the 32-bit version installs under "Program Files (x86)".
Ron _________________ Quad Core 2.66 GHz (Q6700), Intel DP965LT MB, 8 GB Corsair XMS2 RAM (PC2 6400), 160 GB WD HD (System), 2 x 320GB Seagate HD (audio, samples), GeForce 7300LE, Silverstone ST50EF-Plus PS, Norco D810 RM Chassis, 24" LCD Monitor, Presonus Firepod, Windows 7 x64, C5-32, C5-64, Sonar 8.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
project71beats Member
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oh ok, I just thought when you try to do that it would just try and repair the current version. Will do it later today. _________________ Cubase 5.5.2
Mbox 2
Steinberg Houston(died)
Korg TRITON Extreme
Akai MPD24
Yamaha HS80m
Windows 7 Premium 64 bit
Core 2 quad@ 2.3 -6gb Ram |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suprawill1 Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 651 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| project71beats wrote: | | oh ok, I just thought when you try to do that it would just try and repair the current version. Will do it later today. |
Nope. They are 2 separate programs. Just put your load disc in and navigate to CB 64 exe. I did this just last week because I wanted to revert CB64 to it's 1st version. _________________ Home Built - Antec 300 Case - Intel Q9550@ 3.4G - Gigabyte-UD3R - 8G Ballistix RAM - Vista64 Business - C Studio 5 64&32 - Nvidia 9800GT oc - WD Velociraptor 150 - WD Caviar Blk 640 - WD Caviar Blk 1TB - Gemini II Cooler - Corsair VX 550 Pwr Supply - Tascam FW1082 Mxr/Sndcrd/Intrfce/Surface Ctrl - Dual Monitors - Addictive Drms - HSO - Melodyne Editor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oscat101 Member
Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Posts: 270 Location: London. UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| backbeat wrote: | The performance from Cubase 32Bit under 64Bit OS for me is better than CB 64Bit.
Try it! Make a Project under 32Bit with your favorite Plugins and save it, then open it in the 64Bit version and see how it performs. |
Not here, though don't use vst bridge, use jbridge and in settings untick "get audio time hack" something like that and tick performance mode --- not all plugins will like this, though Amplitube3, T racks3 and Sampletank seem fine also TC electronic's Fabrik C and R as do all the plugins I use. I can run one or two more vsti tracks in 64 bit than 32 bit.
Obviously it's not set in stone, and close, but 64 bit has advantage here.
I use Kontakt Player as my only 64 bit plugin, I really wish that IK multimedia and TC electronics developers would put their foot on the pedal as far as 64 bit goes, but still no news, until that time jbridge works really well. _________________ Chipset is IP35 pro on an Abit board IP35 Pro (ICH9R Raid)
2 x Samsung HD501LJ ACHI
MSI passive nvidia 8600
Q6600 at 3.06 Ghz
8 Gb G-Skill PC8500 DDR2 at 1020
Windows 7 64 bit
Samsung SATA DVD Drive
SATA DVDRW Drive
TC electronic Konnect 24D, Alpha Track and M Audio axiom 49 ----Cubase 5.5.2, Amplitube 3.0.2 SampleTank 2.5.4. T-Racks 3 Deluxe 3,1.2, CSR 1.1.1, Steve Slater Drums+ Kontakt player 4.1.1 and Amplitube 2.1.4, JimiHendrix 1.0.3, Metal 1.0.3 AmpegSVX 1.1,3, X-Gear 1.5.1, and a few others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robin Heuristic Senior Member
Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 1721 Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It can be tricky when launching projects once you have both installed, generally I have to right click the project file and "Open With" otherwise the wrong host may open. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suprawill1 Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 651 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I usually just open the version of choice and then browse from there. _________________ Home Built - Antec 300 Case - Intel Q9550@ 3.4G - Gigabyte-UD3R - 8G Ballistix RAM - Vista64 Business - C Studio 5 64&32 - Nvidia 9800GT oc - WD Velociraptor 150 - WD Caviar Blk 640 - WD Caviar Blk 1TB - Gemini II Cooler - Corsair VX 550 Pwr Supply - Tascam FW1082 Mxr/Sndcrd/Intrfce/Surface Ctrl - Dual Monitors - Addictive Drms - HSO - Melodyne Editor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ron Garrison Senior Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 1003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Robin Heuristic wrote: | | It can be tricky when launching projects once you have both installed, generally I have to right click the project file and "Open With" otherwise the wrong host may open. |
There was a thread that talked about this to some extent. IIRC there is a way to set it to open the version of choice.
http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=142691&highlight=
Ron _________________ Quad Core 2.66 GHz (Q6700), Intel DP965LT MB, 8 GB Corsair XMS2 RAM (PC2 6400), 160 GB WD HD (System), 2 x 320GB Seagate HD (audio, samples), GeForce 7300LE, Silverstone ST50EF-Plus PS, Norco D810 RM Chassis, 24" LCD Monitor, Presonus Firepod, Windows 7 x64, C5-32, C5-64, Sonar 8.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sherz Grand Senior Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 5968 Location: Aotearoa, Land Of The Long White Cloud
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Generally 64-bit has been more stable for me. There's only one plugin that I use often has been tying me to 32-bit but it seems that a recent update *may* have resolved the issues with 64-bit... we'll see.
I've not noticed any observable performance differences between the two versions. _________________ Black Sands Music
Cubase 5.5(64&32bit), Windows7(64bit), Core2Duo 2.93GHz, 4GB, Gigabyte Mainboard, M-Audio Delta1010 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suprawill1 Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 651 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's strange that in my case, I still have the better performance with 32 bit in Vista 64. Even if I don't use any 32 bit vsts in 64 bit, the asio % is higher with the same project. I have Jbridge just in case but Addictive Drums is the only 32 bit vst that I've used in 64. I've come to conclude that it may be my sound card/interface. Both are stable though and I hadn't any need for more ram usage so all is fine in 32 land. _________________ Home Built - Antec 300 Case - Intel Q9550@ 3.4G - Gigabyte-UD3R - 8G Ballistix RAM - Vista64 Business - C Studio 5 64&32 - Nvidia 9800GT oc - WD Velociraptor 150 - WD Caviar Blk 640 - WD Caviar Blk 1TB - Gemini II Cooler - Corsair VX 550 Pwr Supply - Tascam FW1082 Mxr/Sndcrd/Intrfce/Surface Ctrl - Dual Monitors - Addictive Drms - HSO - Melodyne Editor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Como Baila Member
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 104 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm ... but you seem to be talking about running C5 32bit instead of 64bit under 64bit O/S.
I think I've gotten confused (not the first or last time!) in this thread. I guess that is what most everyone is talking about ... but some people, my self included, have been discussing improvements in 64bit O/S vs. 32bit O/S ... regardless of whether using 32bit or 64bit C5.
You are discussing which version of C5 runs better for you under 64bit O/S, correct?
Como _________________ (AllWinXP Pro) Xeon 3ghz dual dual/4096/ WD Raptors Raid 0, P-IV 2.0/10242 & P-M4 1.2/1024 FireNet w Fx Teleport
RME Multiface PCI-e, Layla 24/96 & Delta 44
Mackie HR624 Monitors
Mackie CU, Novation Zero SL, Novation Nocturne, BCR2000, BRF2000, Trigger Finger, Remote25 & SL880 Pro Controllers
XP-Pro, Cubase SX 5, Acid Pro 6, Ableton Live 6 & Bundled 'Lite' Apps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oscat101 Member
Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Posts: 270 Location: London. UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes your right, sorry about that. _________________ Chipset is IP35 pro on an Abit board IP35 Pro (ICH9R Raid)
2 x Samsung HD501LJ ACHI
MSI passive nvidia 8600
Q6600 at 3.06 Ghz
8 Gb G-Skill PC8500 DDR2 at 1020
Windows 7 64 bit
Samsung SATA DVD Drive
SATA DVDRW Drive
TC electronic Konnect 24D, Alpha Track and M Audio axiom 49 ----Cubase 5.5.2, Amplitube 3.0.2 SampleTank 2.5.4. T-Racks 3 Deluxe 3,1.2, CSR 1.1.1, Steve Slater Drums+ Kontakt player 4.1.1 and Amplitube 2.1.4, JimiHendrix 1.0.3, Metal 1.0.3 AmpegSVX 1.1,3, X-Gear 1.5.1, and a few others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suprawill1 Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 651 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Como Baila wrote: | Hmmm ... but you seem to be talking about running C5 32bit instead of 64bit under 64bit O/S.
I think I've gotten confused (not the first or last time!) in this thread. I guess that is what most everyone is talking about ... but some people, my self included, have been discussing improvements in 64bit O/S vs. 32bit O/S ... regardless of whether using 32bit or 64bit C5.
You are discussing which version of C5 runs better for you under 64bit O/S, correct?
Como |
Actually, in subject of the op, it's 32 vs 64 in OS and CB. So I guess anything concerning performance or stability improvements or lack thereof in either case is on topic. _________________ Home Built - Antec 300 Case - Intel Q9550@ 3.4G - Gigabyte-UD3R - 8G Ballistix RAM - Vista64 Business - C Studio 5 64&32 - Nvidia 9800GT oc - WD Velociraptor 150 - WD Caviar Blk 640 - WD Caviar Blk 1TB - Gemini II Cooler - Corsair VX 550 Pwr Supply - Tascam FW1082 Mxr/Sndcrd/Intrfce/Surface Ctrl - Dual Monitors - Addictive Drms - HSO - Melodyne Editor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guitartoys Member
Joined: 09 Jun 2005 Posts: 164 Location: McLean, VA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, 2010, and we are still having this conversation.
It boils down to what you do, and how much load you put on Cubase.
First, I would argue that regardless of whether you use 32 or 64 bit Cubase, you want to have a 64 bit version of the operating system loaded no matter what. Certainly with more than 4GB of RAM. I use a base of at least 8gb. After the 1st, I will have 12 cores and 24 threads and 12GB RAM.
The reason for the OS being 64 bit is simple. Memory space. In a 32 bit OS environment, all you have is 4GB to work with, and if you have for example, a video card with 1GB of RAM, then you only have 3GB to work with (all of that whopping video memory subtracts from you available memory in a 32 bit environment), less actually due to additional OS needs. I wish they would stop selling the 32 bit version of the OS.
With a 64 bit OS, a 32 bit application can be allocated a full 4GB of RAM entirely to the applicaiton, so a 32 bit application will operate much better in a 64 bit OS environment.
As to whether to use 32 bit or 64 bit Cubase, it comes down to your project sizes, plugins and virtual instruments.
At the end of the day, install a 64 bit OS, and load both. Use the 32 bit version until you find yourself getting constrained, and needing to bounce tracks. Then yes, when you move to the 64 bit version of Cubase you will need to accept the fact that not everyone has gotten their plugs up to 64 bit yet.
I don't use a lot of virtual instruments, but I like effects and things like convolution reverbs.
When I do a mix, I am usually running somewhere between 16 and 24 tracks. Then a whole bunch of additional edit tracks. If you figure 8 tracks for the drums (kick, snare, hi-hat, 3 toms, 2 overheads), 2 guitars, a bass, one to three keyboards (flippin keyboard players, they want to see how many keyboards they can buy and stuff into two racks to look like kerry livgren - that will date me - maybe each being active in dfifferent portions of the song), a lead vocal, and two or three back up vocals, trumpet, sax and violin, that's a bunch of tracks. Then each with a compressor, drums with gates and limiters, and eq, some with pitch correction, maybe multibank compressor on a couple, a vocal stip on 4, then at least three tracks for plate, reverb and delay, then you are stressing the system pretty well.
I doubt you can do that in a 32 bit environment. I haven't tried, I have only used 64 bit for at least two years.
So the key is first the OS. Go 64 bit OS without question. Then just use 32 bit Cubase until you find it is getting stressed, then shift to 64 bit, but make sure you at least buy some additional memory when you do so.
Peace.
Michael _________________ Win7 Pro x64, Dell XPS900, i7 980x, 12GB RAM, 200GB SDD, 2TB RAID 0, ATI, three Dell 22" wide screens |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ESS Studios Member
Joined: 10 Jun 2009 Posts: 199 Location: UK / Spain
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| guitartoys wrote: | [snip]When I do a mix, I am usually running somewhere between 16 and 24 tracks. Then a whole bunch of additional edit tracks. If you figure 8 tracks for the drums (kick, snare, hi-hat, 3 toms, 2 overheads), 2 guitars, a bass, one to three keyboards (flippin keyboard players, they want to see how many keyboards they can buy and stuff into two racks to look like kerry livgren - that will date me - maybe each being active in dfifferent portions of the song), a lead vocal, and two or three back up vocals, trumpet, sax and violin, that's a bunch of tracks. Then each with a compressor, drums with gates and limiters, and eq, some with pitch correction, maybe multibank compressor on a couple, a vocal stip on 4, then at least three tracks for plate, reverb and delay, then you are stressing the system pretty well.
I doubt you can do that in a 32 bit environment. I haven't tried, I have only used 64 bit for at least two years.
[snip] |
Hi, I use WinXP 32bit and I have projects as big and bigger than that and have come nowhere near running out of juice, ram or CPU. I do use UAD and Poco though. I have no plans to move to 64bit any time soon.
Mark _________________ Intel i7 920 2.66GHz, GA-EX58-UD5P, OCZ DDR3 4GB, NVidia 7200GS GC 256MB, Seagate 320GB, 2 x Seagate 1TB, Seasonic SS-650ET-F3 PSU, LG CD/DVD, Rack Case, 10 x USB 2, 3 x Firewire 400, 3 x Firewire 800, RME Fireface 800, 2 x UAD-2 Quads, 4 x UAD-1 (in Magma), Powercore Express, Midex 8, Win XP Pro SP3, Cubase 5.5.2, Wavlab 6.1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|